There were also adverse reactions and concerns to this story. Some members of the community are wondering whether or not the family will end up in the same situation after the six months of free-living ends. Kalyn and Amy are being raised by their single mother, who is responsible for a total of five children. It is also mentioned (not confirmed) that the mother didn’t finish high school. If this is the case, this supports the theory that lack of education serve as a barrier of preventing parents from being socially responsible in their homes. Another theory was confirmed as well; this family is without a father or husband in the home, in which the mother is the “all-doer and all-provider”. It is a parent’s social responsibility to provide the basic needs such as food and shelter for their children.
I raise the question as to whether the Housing Authority acted in a socially responsible manner? The story doesn’t reveal any statements or comments from the Housing Authority describing their reasons for the actions taken. If indeed the family member (the accused drug dealer) was barred from the property then the mother should not have allowed him into her house.
I think that many questions will continue to be raised as this story carries through however the facts are that Kalyn and Amy Lewis are exceptional individuals. Indeed children are our future and as sad as the situation of homelessness may be, I would certainly hope that all children be “injected” with the same dose of perseverance that Kalyn and Amy have.
Read Kalyn and Amy's story, and the community's response from the Post & Courier.
Written by Adrian Lewis
No comments:
Post a Comment